Sunday, October 21, 2012
Mitt Romney's foreign policy approach: "blunder and bluster"
In a series of interviews, Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Senator John Kerry, Admiral John Nathman (ret.), and Former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Michèle Flournoy explain why Mitt Romney is not prepared to be commander-in-chief.
They each lay out how President Obama's leadership has made America stronger, safer and more secure while Mitt Romney has nothing to offer except bluster, chest-thumping, and a commitment to endless war.
Remember - regarding Osama bin Laden, Mitt Romney said "It's not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one man."
President Obama, on the other hand, is the president who gave the order to capture bin Laden. That's a fact. Mitt Romney said wouldn't have continued the hunt for the man who organized the 9/11 attacks.
Romney was also trying to make political gain out of the Libya tragedy within hours of the attack on the US embassy.
Think about all that - who do you want to vote for?
Posted by Randy Slovacek at 2:57 PM