In an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Monday, Paul said he would boycott the Fox Business debate and called the network's decision a "mistake."
"It's a mistake because the thing is we actually have been in the top five or six in most of the recent polls. In fact, last week in a national poll we were just one point out of fourth place. So I think it's a mistake to try to exclude me from the national debate," he said.
"I won't participate in anything that's not first tier because we have a first tier campaign," the Kentucky senator told Blitzer.
Struggling GOP White House hopeful Rand Paul was recently asked if LGBTs should have the right to sue employers who fired them for being gay.
Paul responded to a group of Drake University students saying that the federal government shouldn’t be in the business of protecting LGBT employees from being fired because “there are plenty of other places that will hire you.”
“I think, really, the things you do in your house, just leave those in your house and they wouldn’t have to be a part of the workplace, to tell you the truth,” he said.
CNN's Wolf Blitzer asked him about the remarks last night. Paul stated more than once that he doesn’t think a person should be fired for being gay, but didn't change much else from his original comment:
“I don’t think anybody should be fired for being gay. I do also, though, believe that your personal life should be personal and shouldn’t affect anyone firing you. So I don’t think the decision whether to hire or fire you should be based on things from your personal life. So when I say that it should remain in your house, yeah I don’t think it should be part of the decision-making of the business. So I might have been able to word it better, but I don’t think it should enter into the decision at all.”
So, basically, Paul says "don't be gay at work if you don't want to be fired for being gay?"
I still don't know what he means. Does he mean you shouldn't wear a wedding ring at work if you're gay? Is he referring to be too "stylish?" Flamboyant? Does he also have boundaries for the straight folks to follow?
GOP White House hopeful Rand Paul, while campaigning at Drake University in Iowa, was asked whether an employer should be able to fire an LGBT person just because the employee was LGBT?
Paul worries that if it were illegal for employers to fire gays it would lead to lawsuits and that's not good.
Paul also indicated that even if gays are fired for being who they are, no worries because there are "plenty" of other places that LGBTs can get a new job.
“I think really the things you do in your house, if you could just leave those in your house, they wouldn’t have to be part of the workplace, to tell you the truth,” Paul replied.
“I don’t know that we need to keep adding to different classifications to say the government needs to be involved in hiring and firing,” Paul said. “I think society is rapidly changing, and if you are gay, there are plenty of places that will hire you.”
I'm not sure what "things you do in your house" Paul is talking about. Does he mean leave your wedding ring at home because it's no one's business if you're married? Is that shoving your "lifestyle" down someone's throat? Does that include straight people?
In addition, the senator from Kentucky says most major corporations already have LGBT protections in place, so the government shouldn't get involved. That said, the federal government currently protects folks on the basis of gender, religion, race, age, familial status, disability or citizenship.
Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry has advice for Sens. Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio: Go run for governor before you run for president.
He shared that thought with the Weekly Standard in an interview last week:
"I’ve had more than one individual say, 'You know what, if you want to be the president of the United States, you ought to go back to your home state and be the governor and get that executive experience before you go lead this country,'" said Perry.
The former governor calls the senators "Marco, Ted, and Rand," and made sure to say he has "great respect" for the trio. "They are smart as a tree full of owls," said Perry, "These guys are very, very capable United States senators."
Perry ran a short, unsuccessful bid for the GOP nomination for president in 2012.
He has signaled he will probably announce a second presidential bid on June 4 near Dallas.
Democratic trackers typically follow rival candidates to events in order to keep an eye on them, as was the case at a Rand Paul event in New Hampshire on Monday.
But a tracker from the Democratic opposition research super PAC, American Bridge 21st Century found out the hard way that Paul's staffers lick back.
Speaking with CNN's Dana Bash on marriage equality, Sen. Rand Paul says that while LGBTs can have a "the neutrality of the law that allows contracts with another," he doesn't believe that can be called "marriage."
YouTube's copyright software - Content ID - has automatically blocked the YouTube post of Rand Paul's launch of his 2016 presidential campaign because he entered and exited to music owned by a Warner Music Group recording artist.
In the latest CNN/ORC poll, Democrat Hillary Clinton beats every potential GOP candidate by at least 11 points.
Coming closest to Hillary is Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, but still 11 points behind the former Secretary of State with 54% preferring Clinton and only 43% picking Paul.
Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and current Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker each get only 40% to Hillary's 55%.
And it gets worse for the rest of the pack from there.
In terms of the Democratic nomination, folks like Hillary over Vice-President Biden 62%-15%. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts gets 10%.
The GOP side is still packed up in the teens with Bush getting 16% support, Walker getting 13% and Paul getting 12%.
Appearing on Fox News yesterday, Republican Senator Rand Paul from Kentucky told Bret Baier that allowing gays and lesbians to marry "offends myself and a lot of people."
“I’m for tradition marriage,” Paul said. “I think marriage is between a man and a woman. Ultimately, we could have fixed this a long time ago if we just allowed contracts between adults. We didn’t have to call it marriage, which offends myself and a lot of people.”
“I think having competing contracts that would have given them equivalency before the law would have solved a lot of these problems, and it may be where we’re still headed.”
Clearly, Sen. Paul (a probable candidate for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination) is of a mind that "separate but equal" would suit him better than true marriage equality. But, as everyone knows, "separate but equal" is never "equal."
A spokesperson for the Democratic National Committee, Ian Sams, issued this statement:
“Saying marriage equality ‘offends’ him gives us yet another glimpse of Paul’s true colors — a restrictive, retro social agenda that sets back LGBT rights and questions longstanding gains in civil rights. Support for marriage equality is at record highs, and most Americans now live in states where it’s legal. What’s truly offensive is Rand Paul’s insistence on being stuck in the past and failing to support equal rights for LGBT Americans.”
Sen Rand Paul did himself no favors when speaking to Politico recently about Hillary Clinton's possible run for president in 2016.
"I think all the polls show if she does run, she’ll win the Democrat nomination. But I don’t think it’s for certain. It’s a very taxing undertaking to go through. It’s a rigorous physical ordeal, I think, to be able to campaign for the presidency."
It's not clear if Paul thinks women in their late 60s can't handle the campaign trail, or if it's just Democratic women, or if it's just Hillary. Lately, Paul has been very aggressive about targeting the former secretary of state.
Even the folks over at Fox News thought the comment went too far.
Fox's Neil Cavuto was critical of the attack on Clinton's age, pointing out that she would be the same age as Reagan was on inauguration day, adding that the senator did his own potential GOP candidacy "damage with that condescending swipe."
Even Paul's father, former congressman Ron Paul, who ran for prez himself was 77 at the time.
According to a Quinnipiac University poll released Tuesday, Sen. Rand Paul barely leads the way among national Republican voters with 11% of the vote in a potential 2016 GOP primary.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush all tied for second with 10% of the vote.
However, the Democrats know who they want for 2016. Hillary Clinton leads with 58% of those polled. Coming in a distant second is Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren with 11%. Vice-president Joe Biden comes in third with 9%.
In head to head match ups, Hillary leads all of the GOP folks by a margin of 7-9 points.
Clearly Sen. Rand Paul is attempting to get his ducks in a row for a 2016 presidential run. Note his statement here softening his position on gay marriage to Vocativ:
"I think that the Republican Party, in order to get bigger, will have to agree to disagree on social issues.
"The Republican Party is not going to give up on having quite a few people who do believe in traditional marriage. But the Republican Party also has to find a place for young people and others who don’t want to be festooned by those issues.
"On issues that are very contentious, that involve social mores — I think that allowing different parts of the country to make their decision based on the local mores and culture is a good idea.
"But when it comes to taxes and benefits, the [federal] government ought to take a neutral position — a way where marriage wouldn’t have an effect, positive or negative, on those things."
• Out singer/songwriter and current "It" boy Steve Grand's Kickstarter campaign passes the $200K mark. He was looking for $81K. And he has two more weeks to go...
• Questions are raised about Lady Gaga's Born This Way Foundation as news comes that only $5K in grants were given out. Gaga's mom defends the Foundation saying it isn't built to dole out money.
• A Houston man arrested in the murder of his daughter and her girlfriend was reportedly “not happy” about the couple’s lesbian relationship
• Looks like another "Obamacare victim" is going to save money under her new, improved health insurance, despite GOP spin.