Friday, July 24, 2015

Texas Supreme Court Orders Houston To Repeal LGBT Protections Or Place On Ballot


The Houston Chronicle reports that the Texas Supreme Court has ruled today that Houston City Council must repeal the city's equal rights ordinance or place it on the November ballot.

The ruling comes three months after a state district judge ruled that opponents of Houston's contentious non-discrimination ordinance passed last year failed to gather enough valid signatures to force a repeal referendum.

"We agree with the Relators that the City Secretary certified their petition and thereby invoked the City Council's ministerial duty to reconsider and repeal the ordinance or submit it to popular vote," the Texas Supreme Court wrote in a per curiam opinion. "The legislative power reserved to the people of Houston is not being honored."

The city's equal right ordinance bans discrimination based not just on sexual orientation and gender identity but also, as federal laws do, sex, race, color, ethnicity, national origin, age, religion, disability, pregnancy and genetic information, as well as family, marital or military status.

Houston City Council has 30 days to repeal the ordinance or place it on the November ballot.

More from Project Q Houston:

The state’s highest court also ordered the city to immediately halt enforcement of HERO, which prohibits discrimination against LGBT people in employment, housing, public accommodations, and city contracting.

“But what of the City Council’s complaints of forgery, false oaths, and the like?” the all-Republican court wrote in its 12-page per curiam opinion. “Although these issues were addressed at trial and are now pending before the court of appeals, we note that the City Secretary never claimed the referendum petition was plagued by forgery or perjury. Yet the City Council decided, of its own accord, not to act, disregarding the City Secretary’s certification that the petition had enough signatures.”

Somehow, these folks twist the truth about an ordinance protecting LGBTs into an attack on religious folks.

Which, I guess, could be true if the concern was really about losing your ability to discriminate.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.